无问西东,知行共振 | 第一届清华附中本部&国际部双语辩论赛圆满落幕!

By Thursday December 22nd, 2022Events

– Swipe Left for the English Version –

TUHS&THIS

上周末,由清华附中国际部中文辩论社、英文辩论社和清华附中团委联合举办的第一届清华附中本部与国际部“无问西东”/Co-inspire双语辩论赛圆满落幕。本次比赛中,辩手们在赛场上展现出来的广博的知识,敏捷的才思,自由切换的双语能力和儒雅的辩风,给评委及线上观众都留下了深刻的印象。


决赛

决赛正方辩手 苏清源(清华附中本部)

决赛正方辩手 王玙铎(清华附中本部)

决赛正方辩手 何金泽 (清华附中国际部)

决赛正方辩手 张舒程(清华附中国际部)

决赛反方辩手 盛晴清华附中本部)

决赛反方辩手 杨灵畅清华附中本部)

决赛反方辩手 徐文质(清华附中国际部)

决赛反方辩手 崔桐(清华附中国际部)


本次赛事的决赛于12月18日上午打响,正方联队由本部学生苏清源、 王玙铎与国际部学生何金泽、张舒程组成, 反方联队由本部学生盛晴、杨灵畅与国际部学生徐文质和崔桐组成。双方就“电子竞技应不应该纳入奥运会正式项目”展开了激烈的讨论。正方从奥运会的精神价值论述了电子竞技中展现出来的拼搏精神对青少年的积极作用,又对当今奥运会的困境及其与青年一代的关系进行了探讨,论述了电竞入奥对奥运会本身的正面价值。反方则就奥运会与电子竞技的本质区别进行了深入探讨,认为奥运会原始意义就是展现人类身体的强健,而电子竞技则对身体毫无助力。又基于奥运会反对暴力元素的要求,认为电子竞技进入奥必然会进行大规模的调整,这对于电子竞技本身也未必是件好事儿,而电子竞技的公平性,对青少年的不良影响也十分令人担忧。之后,双方就主要论点展开了逻辑、数据与案例的精彩攻防,其间闪烁着智慧的火花与青春的激情。最终正方队伍以9.5票比反方4.5票获得了此次赛事的冠军。

此次比赛中也涌现出来许多能力出众的优秀辩手,他们是来自附中本部的李苗彤、王玙铎、杨灵畅、苏清源与国际部张舒程、徐文质和何金泽。



参赛感言

参与了本次赛事的辩手们不仅享受到了思辨的乐趣,提升了双语能力,更收获了彼此之间的友谊。


附中辩手 苏清源

这次赛事不仅提高了逻辑思维能力,还提升英语水平,增加自信心。我在与国际部同学讨论辩题、查找资料、写作论稿、携手比赛的过程中建立了深厚的友谊。

附中辩手 王玙铎

很高兴能和许多国际部同学认识,了解大家的想法。参与这次辩论赛也让我切实地对讨论的问题本身有了更深的理解!期待下次彼此交流的机会。

附中辩手 杨灵畅

在本次活动当中我受益匪浅。首先第一点是我的能力提升方面。这次辩论赛的准备时间非常的充分,所以我能够有时间去观看一些非常顶尖的辩论选手的相关辩论。拓宽了我的视野,让我真正看到了什么叫做优秀的辩论选手。而且每次在辩论结束后会有评委进行点评。评委的点评非常的详细和充分,他们会把辩论的每一部分都详细的进行拆解,告诉我们可以提升的方面,尤其是针对一些产生自相矛盾的地方,或者对于论点可以有更深入的阐述的部分,他们都会提出来并且给出精进的方法。聆听评委们细致入微的评价对于我来说是一个非常好的提高自己辩论技术的方式。


第二点是和国际部同学的交友方面,之前我一直不敢去和国际部的同学交流,除了一些之前关系就比较好的同学。但是在和他们交流之后,发现其实他们也抱有着这样的想法。在本次比赛当中,我和我的另外两名国际部的队友一起开会、讨论论点和论据,我们甚至有一天在开完会后还一起聊天,聊了很久。他们也会给予我们专业的英辩方面的技术指导。我们在比赛期间互相加油、出点子、统一一起开摄像头。国际部的老师在比赛后也询问了我们是否愿意以后继续同国际部的同学参与辩论比赛。之前就一直就很想增加两边的沟通交流,现在我发现,其实只要大家敞开心扉,我们都是非常愿意互相培养友谊和感情的。

国际部辩手 徐文质

这不是我第一次附中同学接触了,之前的数次支教活动让我与附中许多同学结下了深厚的友谊。这次和附中同学一起备赛、比赛的过程是轻松愉悦的,他们身上散发出的领导力、沟通交流能力、创造力和包容开放的态度给我留下了深刻的印象,希望附中与国际部学生之间能够有更多交流、学习的机会。另外,最值得一提的就是许多辩手(甚至包括评委)都带病参加比赛,他们的坚持、努力,都十分令人敬佩!

国际部辩手 王锦敖

这次比赛,我们队伍和对方队伍辩手的水平都很高,我们在场上有很精彩的交锋!尤其是我方三辩来自本部的辩手李苗彤在做质询的时候有很多值得学习的技术动作。这次比赛让我有机会结识了附中的辩论高手,与他们在赛前一起准备辩题的过程中收获了很多!

国际部辩手 何金泽

总体来说这次双语辩论赛是一次很愉快的体验。附中的两位同学很热情友好,对待比赛也比我想象中认真。渐渐熟络起来后,我们也会在讨论辩题以外畅聊,分享各自的生活,像是世界杯、游戏以及各自学校的日常生活种种。决赛当天,队伍中三个人都在生病,但大家都在坚持,这也是一个比较有趣的经历。再有一点不得不说的就是,虽然很早就明白附中的中文能力很强,但当我看到我方一辩每次都能在讨论结束一小时后左右写出一辩稿,还是会感到惊讶!





点评回顾

本次赛事的成功举办也离不开附中本部与国际部老师、优秀毕业生与辩手的大力支持,他们鞭辟入里的点评,给了场上的小辩手启发性的思考,也对本次的赛事给与了很高的评价!


评委——清华附中英语组 李雨洁老师

作为清华附中举办的第一届双语辩论赛,此次“无问西东”线上辩论赛组织有序、赛制清晰,给予了本部及国际部的选手一个展示自我的平台。各位辩手为此次比赛做了充分准备,不论是在申论与质询环节,还是对辩与结辩环节,辩手们都展示了良好的双语辩论能力及思辨能力。我相信,本次比赛确实达到了“co-inspire”的目的,无疑是一次成功的开拓性尝试。希望今后本部和国际部能够有更多的合作,促进学生之间的交流互动,助双方共同进步!

评委——清华附中本部优秀毕业生 

张天翼

有幸做一个倾听者,能享受附中同学带给我的一场精彩交锋。听得出来同学们想在场上大展辩才,但辩论的价值真的在于最终场上证成的那些观点吗?其实在我看来不尽然。我想辩论需要我们进入对方的语境基于理解,平和而诚恳地讨论、理性而客观地比较,最终得出结论。抛下偏见与执念、割舍了胜负,辩论场上最后留下了思想的碰撞,如此真正做到co-inspire。

评委——国际部优秀辩手 钱弘毅

作为评委,能够看到各种不同的风格、心态、文化和语言融合成一个完整的辩论赛,这对我来说是一次非同寻常的经历。我能感觉到越是当辩论变得更加激烈时,我们的辩手在对方面前就越自如。我认为所有的辩手都表现得非常出色,因为他们是第一次参加这样的比赛,特别是考虑到线上进行,同时有些辩手还出现了生病的情况,他们依然在比赛中表现出了智慧和对对方的尊重。我非常乐观地认为,”Co-inspire”双语辩论赛在未来会越来越好,国际部和附中之间的联系也会越来越紧密。

评委——国际部英语组老师 Andrew Gatewood

本部与国际部学生的双语能力都很棒,给我留下了深刻的印象!他们在辩论赛场上展现出来的才华与风度,让我觉得听他们的比赛是一种享受!期待明年的双语辩论赛,我到时候一定鼎力支持!

赛事主席——国际部中文辩论社辩手 王佑

在主持了这次辩论赛后,我也有些技痒,之前都是参加中文辩论的,这次是一个双语的比赛。我主持了一场也看了一整场,感觉辩手们的发挥都很出色。不管是从论点,论据方面抑或是现场的发挥来说都让这次的比赛变得相当精彩。当然,也可能是因为辩论经验和准备时间,其实从我的视角看,有些论点可以更完善一些,给对手留下更少的攻击角度。我希望这个活动可以一直办下去,不管是对国际部还是对本部这都是一个互相了解的过程,也是一个熟悉不同环境不同思考方式的过程,胜负反而没有那么重要了。如果还有下一届,我肯定要试试自己上去打比赛!

评委—国际部优秀毕业生 王天一

当我还在国际部十二年级的时候,就提出过好几次希望举办双语辩论赛的想法,不过没有合适的时机。作为前辩论社社长的我,当时也总是在想怎样能够做得更好。三年后,当看到这个想法终于成为了现实,我们举办了实际的辩论赛,这对我们国际部和附中的同学们来说都是一个巨大的惊喜!同时,能够感受到我的母校在变得越来越好,心中就充满了喜悦。我期待着在未来听到来自学弟学妹们更多创新的想法。

评委—国际部优秀辩手 席浩云

作为最开始提出题目的评委,这个题目我自己打过、听过挺多遍,但是场上双方的立论以及交锋经常时不时的让我觉得眼前一亮。在如此短的备赛周期、疫情的影响、双语赛制的高要求、以及国际部队员和附中队员之前不认识的情况下,仍然能呈现一场观感很高交锋很有趣的比赛,让我不由得为附中以及国际部参赛选手强大的心理学理素质感到佩服。作为国际部中文辩论社的骨干,这次比赛也给了我些新的启发和想法。我由衷地希望这类活动能够延续下去,附中和国际部的辩手可以继续互相学习、一起成长并享受辩论的乐趣。期待后续活动!



TUHS&THIS

至此,第一届清华附中本部与国际部的双语辩论赛圆满结束,感谢各位辩手、评委和主持人的支持!来年我们会扩大赛事规模,也期待更多的同学加入其中!让我们一起以思辨为媒,双语为桥,彼此激发,共同成长!


TUHS&THIS

Last weekend, the first TUHS&THIS “No Questions Asked”/Co-inspire Bilingual Debate Tournament, jointly organized by THIS Chinese Debate Club, English Debate Club and TUHS League Committee, took place. The judges and the online audience were impressed by the extensive knowledge, quick thinking, the bilingual abilities, and elegant debate styles of the participants.

Final Round

Qingyuan Su, Final Round Pro Side (TUHS)

Yuduo Wang, Final Round Pro Side (TUHS)

Ken He, Final Round Pro Side (THIS)

Robert Zhang, Final Round Pro Side (THIS)

Qing Sheng,

Final Round Con Side (TUHS)

Lingchang Yang, 

Final Round Con Side (TUHS)

Oscar Tsui, 

Final Round Con Side (THIS)

Tina Cui, Final Round Con Side (THIS)


The final round was held in the morning of December 18th. The claim side consisted of Su Qingyuan and Wang Yuduo from TUHS and Ken He and Robert Zhang from THIS. The counterclaim side was TUHS’s Sheng Qing and Yang Lingchang, and THIS’s Oscar Tsui and Tina Cui. Both sides engaged in heated discussion on “Whether e-sports should be included in the official sports of the Olympic Games”. The claim side discussed the spiritual value of the Olympic Games, the positive effects of E-Sports on young people, the dilemma of the Olympic Games today and its relationship with the young generation – the overall positive value of e-sports to the Olympic Games. On the other side, the counterclaim side discussed, in depth, the essential difference between the Olympic Games and e-sports, arguing that the original meaning of the Olympic Games is to show the physical strength of human beings and how e-sports do not help the body. Based on the requirement of the Olympic Games, it is believed that the entry of e-sports into the Olympic Games will inevitably lead to massive adjustments, which may not be good for e-sports itself. Additionally, the fairness of e-sports is also very worrying influence on youth. Both sides launched a wonderful attack and defense of logic, data and cases on the main arguments, during which the spark of wisdom and youthful passion shone. Ultimately, the claim side won the champion with 9.5 votes to 4.5 votes for the counterclaim side.

Many outstanding debaters emerged from the tournament including Li Miaotong, Wang Yuduo, Yang Lingchang, Su Qingyuan from TUHS and Robert Zhang, Oscar Tsui and Ken He from THIS.



Debater Reflection

All the debaters not only enjoyed the fun discourse and improved their bilingual skills, but they also built friendships along the way.


Qingyuan Su, TUHS Debater 


The tournament not only improved my logical thinking skills, but also improved my English and increased my self-confidence. I built a deep friendship with my THIS team members as they discussed the debate topic, looked for information, wrote their arguments and joined hands in the tournament.

Yuduo Wang, TUHS Debater


It was great to get to know many of THIS students and learn about their ideas. Participating in this debate also gave me a deeper understanding of the issues under discussion! I look forward to the next opportunity to interact with each other.

Lingchang Yang, TUHS Debater


I have benefited a lot from this event. First of all, my competence has been greatly improved. The preparation time for this debate was very good, so I was able to have time to watch some very top debaters as well. It broadened my horizons and allowed me to really see what it means to be a good debater. Also, after each round, there were comments from the judges. They would break down each part of the debate in detail and tell us what we could improve on, especially if there were some contradictions or if there was more depth to the arguments. They would suggest ways to improve. Listening to the judges’ detailed comments was a very good way for me to improve my debating skills.


The second is the friendship with THIS students. Previously, I was shy to communicate with THIS students, except for some students who I had a good relationship with before. However, after talking with them, I found that they also have the same mentality, but the students of the two departments have not been able to have in-depth communication opportunities. In this competition, my other two teammates from THIS and I met and discussed arguments together, and we even chatted together for a long time after the meeting one day. They would also give us professional technical guidance on English debating. We cheered each other on during the competition, came up with ideas, and unified together to open the camera. After the tournament, the THIS teachers asked us if we would like to continue to participate in debates with THIS in the future. I have been trying to improve the communication between THIS and TUHS, and now I find that we are all very willing to develop friendship and relationship with each other as long as we open our hearts.

Oscar Tsui, THIS Debater


This is not the first time I have communicated with TUHS students, as I have formed deep friendships with many of them through several previous voluntary teaching trips. I was impressed by their leadership, communication skills, creativity, and openness. I hope that there will be more opportunities for exchange and learning between TUHS and THIS students. Also, the most noteworthy thing is that many of the debaters (even the judges) took part in the competition with illness, and their perseverance and efforts are very admirable!

Michael Wang, THIS Debater


Both our team and the opponent’s debaters were of a high level, and we had a great exchange on the field! Especially, our third debater, Miaotong Li, from TUHS, had a lot of technical moves to learn when she did her questioning. This tournament gave me the opportunity to get to know the best debaters inside the school and I gained a lot from preparing the arguments together with them before the tournament!

Ken He, THIS Debater


Overall, this bilingual debate tournament was a very enjoyable experience. The two students from TUHS were very enthusiastic and friendly, and took the competition more seriously than I expected. As we got to know each other better, we shared our lives outside of the debate, such as the World Cup, games, and the daily life of our respective schools. On the day of the finals, three of the team members were sick, but we all kept going, which was also an interesting experience. One more thing I have to say is that although I have known for a long time that the Chinese language skills of TUHS students are excellent, I was still surprised to see that our first defense could write the first defense about an hour after the end of the discussion every time!




Review

The success of the tournament would not have been possible without the support of the teachers, outstanding graduates and debaters from both TUHS and THIS, whose insightful comments gave the young debaters on the field inspiring thoughts and high praise for the tournament!


Judge—Ms.Yujie Li, 

TUHS English Teacher 


As the first TUHS&THIS Bilingual Debate Tournament, the “No Questions Asked” online debate tournament was well organized and clearly structured, giving a platform for the contestants from TUHS and THIS to showcase themselves. All the debaters were well prepared, and they showed their bilingual debating ability and discernment in both the argument and questioning sessions, as well as in the confrontation and closing arguments. I believe that this competition has really achieved the purpose of “co-inspire”, which is undoubtedly a successful pioneering attempt. I hope that there will be more cooperation between TUHS and THIS in the future, so as to promote the interaction between students and help both sides make progress together!

Judge—Tianyi Zhang, 

TUHS Outstanding Graduate


It is lucky for me to be a listener and to enjoy a great exchange of ideas brought to me by the students. I could hear that the students wanted to show off their arguments on the field, but is the value of the debate really in the points that are ultimately proven on the field? In fact, in my opinion, not really. I think debates require us to enter the other side’s context based on understanding, discuss calmly and sincerely, compare rationally and objectively, and finally reach a conclusion. After we put aside our prejudices and obsessions, and let go of winning and losing, the debate field is finally left with the collision of ideas, so that we can really achieve co-inspiration.

Judge—Winston Qian, 

THIS Outstanding Debater


As a judge, it was a truly extraordinary experience to see the melding of many different styles, mindsets, cultures and languages into a fully formed debate, and I could feel that our debaters were starting to feel increasingly comfortable in each other’s presence, especially as the debate became more intense and passionate. I think all the debaters performed wonderfully as the first people ever to participate in such an event, especially considering the fact that we were online and some debaters were suffering COVID symptoms, and showed both intellect and respect in this event. I am very optimistic that the Co-Inspire Bilingual Debate will grow bigger and better in the future, and the bond between THIS and Tsinghua High School will only become stronger.

Judge—Mr. Andrew Gatewood, 

THIS ELS Teacher


I was impressed by the great bilingual competence of both TUHS and THIS students! The talent and poise they showed on the debate floor made it a pleasure to listen to them play! I look forward to next year’s Bilingual Debate Tournament, and I will definitely support it!

Chairman—Kevin Wang, 

Member of THIS Chinese Debate Club


I have participated in Chinese debates before, but this was a bilingual tournament. I moderated and watched the whole game, and I felt that the debaters played very well. The arguments and the play on the spot all made the tournament quite exciting. Of course, it may be because of the debating experience and preparation time. In fact, from my point of view, some arguments could be better and leave less angles for the opponents to attack. I hope this event can continue, no matter it is for the international department or the main office, it is a process of getting to know each other, and it is also a process of getting familiar with different environments and different ways of thinking. Winning and losing are not so important. If there is another session, I will definitely try to play the game myself!

Judge—Tianyi Wang, 

THIS Outstanding Graduate


The idea of a bilingual debate was tossed around a few times during my senior year at THIS, but it never was fully thought out and executed. As a former Debate club exec — partially my fault. Coming back after three years and seeing that idea take the form of an actual debate tournament that not only included our students but also Fuzhong students was a very pleasant surprise. It’s always great to know that THIS is getting better and better every year. I look forward to the many new and innovative ideas that are to come.

Judge—Bill Xi, 

THIS Outstanding Debater


As the judge who first proposed the topic, I have played and heard this topic many times myself, but the arguments and exchanges between the two sides on the field often made me feel brighter. With such a short preparation period, the impact of the pendemic, the high demands of the bilingual system, and the fact that TUHS members and THIS members did not know each other very well before, I was still able to present a very interesting competition with a high sense of communication. As a experienced member of THIS Chinese Debate Club, this competition also gave me some new inspirations and ideas. I sincerely hope that this kind of activities will continue, and that the debaters from TUHS and THIS will continue to learn from each other, grow together, and enjoy the fun of debating. I look forward to the upcoming events!



TUHS&THIS

The first TUHS&THIS Bilingual Debate Tournament has concluded successfully. Thank you to all the debaters, judges and moderators for your support! In the coming year, we will expand the scale of the tournament and look forward to more students joining it! Let’s take the debate as a medium and the bilingual as a bridge to inspire each other and grow together!



文字 Writing | Chao Qian

排版 Editing | Mia Gu

审核 Auditing | Dieu-Anh Nguyen, Toni Dong, Wenping Li






本篇文章来源于微信公众号: 清华附中国际部

Leave a Reply